REGULATIONS
FOR STUDENT DISCIPLINARY CODE
(By-law 189/1988,
157/1989, 92/1990, 364/1991, 112/1993, 113/1993, 234/1994, 280/1994, 158/1995,
334/1995, 1215/1996, 58/1999, 557/1999, 699/1999, 854/2007, 435/2010)
Regulation under Articles 30 and 32
Eastern Mediterranean University Senate prepared the following Regulation
in accordance with Articles 30 and 32 of Eastern Mediterranean University
Education, Examinations and Success By-Law.
CHAPTER I
AIM, SCOPE, DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
Brief Name 22.09.2023 R.G. 192 EK III A.E. 755, 21.02.2024 R.G. 37 EK III A.E. 181 |
1. |
This regulation is titled as the “Eastern Mediterranean University
Student Disciplinary Code”. |
Aim |
2. |
This regulation has the aim of defining the
penalties to be imposed for students who have failed to fulfill duties
assigned to them by rules, regulations, directives and principles or who have
taken part in prohibited activities, both within and outside Eastern
Mediterranean University. This regulation also specifies disciplinary
investigations, disciplinary penalties, bodies imposing disciplinary
penalties, procedures to be followed in imposing disciplinary penalties and
in making appeals against them. |
Scope |
3. |
This regulation covers disciplinary procedures of students who study at
Eastern Mediterranean University and disciplinary proceedings related to
disciplinary penalties committed during the period of enrollment for former
students whose connection with the University has been terminated for any
reason. |
Definitions |
4. |
Unless
otherwise stated in this Regulation; Information System refers
to one or more devices capable of automatically processing data within a
specific software framework or a connected or interrelated series of devices. Disciplinary Board refers to the committee elected by EMU Senate and is responsible for student
disciplinary procedures of the University. Ethics Board refers to the Eastern Mediterranean University Research and Publication
Ethics Board (BAYEK). Student refers to an individual who is registered in an EMU program or is a
current student of EMU or a former student of EMU. Rectorate refers to the Eastern Mediterranean University Rector’s Office. University refers to the Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU). Any Person Affiliated with the University refers to academic or
administrative personnel who works full-time or part-time in the university
or in relevant units or revolving fund services, students, all individuals,
whether employed on a contractual or commissioned basis, engaging in
administrative, managerial, or academic activities at the university through
appointment or invitation, providing services, or operating within the campus
under a lease or operator agreement signed with the university, and as
applicable, their employees. Data Packet refers to the portable, minimized form of data that will be transmitted
over a communication network connection. The terms “Department, Department Chair, Dean, Institute, Faculty,
Preparatory School, Director of the Preparatory School, Rector, Rectorate,
Senate, University (EMU), Board of Trustees (VYK), Statute, School, School
Director” have the same meaning as those given in the Statute establishing the
North Cyprus Education Foundation and Eastern Mediterranean University
(18/1986). |
CHAPTER II
DISCIPLINARY PENALTIES AND OFFENCES
CHAPTER III
DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION
Authorized Investigation
Officials |
7. |
Officials authorized to start investigations are as follows: |
|
(1) |
In cases where the disciplinary offences or group incidents have been
committed by a group of students from multiple faculties and schools, the
Vice Rector affiliated with the Student Disciplinary Board, |
||
(2) |
In cases where the disciplinary offence has been committed by a
postgraduate student, the Director of the Institute for Graduate Studies and
Research, |
||
(3) |
In cases where the disciplinary offence has been committed by a Faculty
student, the Dean of the relevant faculty, |
||
(4) |
In cases where the disciplinary offence has been committed by a student
from one of the Schools, the Director of the relevant School, |
||
(5) |
In cases where it is deemed necessary, the Rector or Vice Rector
affiliated with the Student Disciplinary Board. |
||
Authorized officials conduct a disciplinary investigation by appointing
an investigator or investigators. Members
of the Student Disciplinary Board cannot be appointed as investigators. |
|||
Investigation Period |
8. |
(1) |
Disciplinary investigation official launches an investigation and
appoints investigator(s) within the first 10 working days after the offence
has been reported. |
(2) |
In cases where the Rector’s office decides not to use its power to launch
an investigation for an informed disciplinary matter, another Investigation
Official is informed regarding the matter within 10 working days. In this
respect, the relevant Investigation Official launches an investigation on the
matter within 10 working days, starting from the day s/he was initially
informed on the matter by the Rector’s Office, |
||
(3) |
The investigation must be finalized within a maximum of 15 days from the
official appointment of the investigator(s). |
||
(4) |
If the investigation has not been concluded within the given time limit,
the investigator may demand, for once-only, in writing an extension of an
additional period of 15 days stating his/her reasons for it, |
||
(5) |
Only in cases where there are students from more than one faculty or
school involved in disciplinary offences and, collective student incidents,
then, the investigator(s) appointed to carry out the investigation may
request from their authorized official, whom initially assigned the duty of
investigator(s), for a second and the final time, in writing an extension of
an additional period of 10 days stating his/her reasons for it. |
||
Conduct of Investigation |
9. |
(1) |
The investigator hears the witnesses, collects facts and consults
experts. A record of the proceedings must be kept at each stage and it should
include the following information: the time, place and nature of the
investigation, the identity of those present, and the questions put and
answers given if an affidavit has been made. The record is then signed by the
investigator, the secretary and the party who made the affidavit or those
that were present during the fact-finding process, and those that provided
certain documents. |
(2) |
Statements that are taken online must be recorded and the relevant
recording is added into the registration investigation report file. For
online statements, a signature is not sought from the individual who gives
the statement. |
||
(3) |
The personnel of the University are obliged to provide promptly all the
information, records, documents, and assistance that the investigator(s) may
require. In accordance with professional ethics,
information that requires confidentiality is not within the scope of this
regulation. |
||
(4) |
In the event of student(s) changing places within the University,
changing the higher education institution or leaving the higher education
institution, regardless of the reason, the process of launching the
investigation, its conduct and taking the necessary decisions is not impeded. |
||
The Right to Defense |
10. |
(1) |
A student who is the subject of a Disciplinary Investigation is informed through
an invitation, of the offence imputed to her/him at least three days prior to
the date on which s/he is required to present her/his defense. Then, notices
are put up on notice boards in the relevant academic unit of the student to
inform her/him that s/he should contact the investigator to present her/his
defense. Moreover, the notification is also sent to the relevant student’s
portal account or student e-mail address (……@emu.edu.tr). |
(2) |
If the student has not collected the invitation for defense and s/he has
not contacted the investigator(s) on the specified date, s/he will be deemed
to have waived his/her right to a defense and the investigation is conducted
solely based on other evidence in her/his absentia. |
||
(3) |
The student collects the enclosed invitation concerning the investigation
sent to her/him from the Institute, Faculty or School Secretariat by
providing signature. The notification sent to the student provides
information on the nature of the offence imputed on the student and the
student is instructed to appear to conduct her/his defense at the time, date
and place specified in the notification. In the notification, it is made
clear that if s/he ignores the notification without a valid excuse or fails
to inform the authorities of his/her excuse in time, s/he will lose the right
to defend her/himself and a decision will be made about her/him based on
other evidence. |
||
(4) |
If the student provides a valid excuse for her/his failure to appear or
proves that s/he was prevented from appearing by conditions beyond her/his
control, s/he is either allocated a new date for defense or allowed a
reasonable period in which s/he is required to send her/his defense in
writing. Students who are under arrest are informed that they can send their
defense in writing or via e-mail through their student e-mail addresses
allocated to them by the University. The defense must be submitted or send to
the investigator. |
||
(5) |
The conduct of the investigation should allow the student to use her/his
right to defend fully. However, it is
not allowed to exceed the investigation time limitations stipulated in the
regulations under the pretext of defense. |
||
Investigation Report |
11. |
A report is prepared at the end of the investigation by the investigator.
The report includes the approval for the investigation, starting date of the
investigation, the identity of the student/s who is/are the subject of the
investigation, the nature of the committed offences, stages of the
investigation, evidence and student’s/students’ defense. In the report, each
item of offence is individually considered, the evidence obtained is
carefully assessed to determine whether or not the offence was actually
committed and appropriate penalty is proposed. The originals and copies of
existing documents are enclosed with the report and are submitted to the
authorized official in a file. |
|
Possible Measures to Be
Taken During Investigation |
12. |
(1) |
If deemed necessary, the investigator(s) may request the authorized
official to submit a request to the Vice Rector who is in charge of issues
regarding Student Disciplinary Board to ban the suspect from entering the
University premises |
(2) |
Independent of the regulation made under the first paragraph of this
article, the Vice Rector responsible for the Student Disciplinary Board is
authorized to issue a mandatory decision prohibiting the accused students
from entering University premises during the investigation, if deemed
necessary. |
||
Concluding the Disciplinary
Investigation |
13. |
(1) |
The investigation is finalized following the submission of the
investigation report and file to the authorized official launching the
investigation. |
(2) |
The authorized official by whom the investigation has been launched takes
the relevant action within the framework of Article 14, within 6 (six)
working days following the submission of the investigation file and the
report. |
||
(3) |
The authorized official or Disciplinary Board examining the investigation
report and file may ask the investigator to correct any defects which are
found in the process of the investigation. The investigator is granted extra
4 working days to complete such procedures, independently of the period
allocated to her/him in accordance with Article 8. |
||
Officials and Boars Authorized to Impose Disciplinary Penalties |
14. |
The Rector, relevant Vice Rector, Dean of the faculty or the Director of
an institute or school is authorized to issue a warning or a reprimand. Short-,
medium- or long-term suspension penalties or dismissal from the University
penalty are imposed by the Disciplinary Board. |
CHAPTER IV
DISCIPLINARY BOARD
Formation of the Disciplinary Board |
15. |
(1) |
The Disciplinary Board consists of a member and a stand-by member from
each Faculty, School and Institute, Foreign Languages and English Preparatory
School as well as a student member and stand-by student member elected by the
University Student Council. |
(2) |
The Disciplinary Board members are proposed by Institute Director,
Faculty Deans and Directors of Schools and English Preparatory School among
academic staff members of the unit (in Institute academic staff members
teaching in postgraduate programs) and the proposed names are submitted to
the Senate for approval. |
||
(3) |
Academic Staff members of the Disciplinary Board are elected for a period
of two years and student members serve for a period of one year. Members
whose period of service expires, may be re-elected. |
||
(4) |
The proposed members must not have any disciplinary record in their
files. If the member is found guilty
of committing any disciplinary offenses, s/he loses her/his membership. The
replacement member is elected through the same method. If the member is a
suspect or accused in any disciplinary investigation, s/he cannot attend the
EMU Disciplinary Board meetings. |
||
(5) |
At the Student Disciplinary Board, the duty of chairmanship is undertaken
by the representative of a different faculty/school/English Preparatory
School each academic year. The unit
representative or by-proxy undertaking the duty of the chairmanship is
expected to be an academic administrator who has reduction in course load
(e.g. dean/assistant director, department chair/assistant director). The unit
secretary of the academic staff member who has undertaken the duty of the
chairmanship in the Board undertakes the responsibility of all written and official
correspondence issues. However, if there are not two faculty members with
administrative responsibilities receiving a reduction in teaching load,
except the administrative staff with the position of Dean or Director in the
academic unit, a faculty member from the same academic unit can be appointed
as an alternate member of the Disciplinary Board. In the absence of the
chair, this member can preside over the Student Disciplinary Board. |
||
(6) |
The duty of chairmanship is assigned according to faculty/school/ school
code (starting from 01). Substitute member of the faculty/school/school who
has undertaken the duty of the chairmanship carries out duties as the Acting
Chairperson and attends and chairs meetings which the Chairperson is unable
to attend. |
||
(7) |
If deemed necessary by the Board, a legal advisor found suitable by the
Rector’s Office assists the Board. |
||
(8) |
The appointment of the Disciplinary Board is essential at the beginning
of each Academic Year. However, the existing Disciplinary Board continues its
duties until the new Disciplinary Board is appointed to conclude cases
pending from the previous year. |
||
Duties of the Disciplinary Board |
16. |
Following are the duties of the
Disciplinary Board: |
|
(1) |
In light
of the investigation report and investigation file, evaluating the findings
after listening to the student being accused with an offence and, in cases
where a penalty is called for making a decision on the nature of the penalty.
Iif the complainant is a member of the Disciplinary Board, such memer will
have no right to vote in the decision to be made. |
||
(2) |
Reconsidering previous Disciplinary Board decisions that are forwarded by
the Rector’s Office. Reporting to the Rector’s Office the Board’s reasons for
changing or not changing any decisions. |
||
(3) |
Meeting at the end of every semester to review the student disciplinary situation
in general and advising the Vice Rector’s Office concerning the Student
Disciplinary Board some measures to be taken for the consideration. |
||
(4) |
Making proposals for the amendment of the Student Disciplinary Regulations
with the consideration of difficulties experienced in implementation of the relevant
rules/regulations. |
||
Convening of the Disciplinary Board |
17. |
(1) |
The Disciplinary Board convenes upon the call of the Chairperson or
Acting Chairperson by a simple majority. The Board makes its decisions by the
majority of the members present in the meeting. During voting, abstention is
not allowed. In case of a tie, the vote of the Chairperson determines the
decision. In the absence of the Chairperson, the Acting Chairperson acts as the
Chairperson. |
(2) |
Members are expected to regularly attend the meetings and inform their
units, accordingly. A member not attending a meeting due to a valid excuse,
ensures the attendance of the substitute member for his/her place. The Dean
or Director of a Faculty/School is informed by the Chair of the Board when
the representative of the relevant unit fails to attend two consecutive
meetings, for the purpose of ensuring regular attendance to meetings.
Teaching hours of representatives acting as a member of the Board are
arranged by the relevant unit with a consideration of the Board meeting
times. |
||
Decisions of the Disciplinary Board |
18. |
(1) |
The Disciplinary Board makes a decision on a case latest within 45 days
of receiving the request. However, disciplinary files submitted to the
Disciplinary Board within the last two weeks leading up to the last day of
lectures, within the Final Examination period, or after this period may be
postponed to the following semester upon the decision of the Disciplinary Board.
Decision on postponed cases must be given within 45 days from the starting
date of lectures of the following semester. |
|
(2) |
The decision of postponement by the Disciplinary Board also applies for
the appeals submitted after the decision of postponing is made and,
procedures concerning the evaluation of the objections are suspended until
the course commencement of the following academic semester. |
|
|
(3) |
The Disciplinary Board is free to accept or reject the mode of punishment
proposed in the report of investigation.
The Board can put another disciplinary punishment into force provided
that the reasons for it are explained.
|
|
|
(4) |
In the case of a disciplinary investigation being launched due to the
same incident, the Disciplinary Board may decide to postpone the disciplinary
investigation. In cases as such, durations specified in paragraph (1) of this
Article are not taken into consideration.
|
|
Paragraph 154 |
(5) |
The conviction or non-conviction of the accused
under the Penal Code does not constitute an impediment to the application of
disciplinary proceedings. |
|
|
(6) |
In disciplinary investigations initiated by the Disciplinary Board with
allegations of plagiarism, the Board may request an opinion from the EMU
Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Board for the determination of
plagiarism. In such a case, the timelines specified in the paragraph (1) of
this article are suspended until the opinion of the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Board is communicated to the Disciplinary Board. |
|
Right to Defense |
19. |
Following the completion of the investigation and before making a
decision concerning an accused student, the Disciplinary Board must give a
chance to the student for defending himself / herself before the Disciplinary
Board. However, if the accused student fails to appear before the
Disciplinary Board without any valid reason, a decision in absentia will be made. |
|
Putting Decisions in Writing |
20. |
Decisions are written together with reasons behind them, evidences are
summarized, articles of the statute, regulation, by-law, or policy upon which
the decisions are based indicated, and signed by the members supporting the
decision. Members opposing the decision note their objection and sign. The
Chairperson of the Disciplinary Board is responsible for all the other
correspondence relevant to the Board and is liable to submitting all the
taken decisions to the Rector’s Office. The justified decisions of the
Disciplinary Board are submitted to the approval of the Rector’s Office
within 15 working days. |
|
Finalization of the Decisions |
21. |
Decisions of the Disciplinary Board are finalized as follows: |
|
(1) |
Disciplinary Board decisions are finalized following the approval of the
Rector’s Office within the 10 working days as from the decision is submitted
to the Rector’s Office for approval. |
||
(2) |
If the Rector considers a decision and/or given penalty by the
Disciplinary Board submitted for approval as not appropriate or procedurally
incorrect, s/he can state the reasons and request the Disciplinary Board to
reconsider the relevant decision or penalty. In such a
case, the timelines specified in the paragraph (1) of this article are
suspended. The Board reviews and concludes the received request and its prior
decision within 15 working days from the date of referral to it, excluding
the deferral period specified in Article 18(1) of this Regulation. |
||
(3) |
The Disciplinary Board can either make a new decision in its second time
evaluation or repeat its previous decision following the reconsideration. |
||
(4) |
The reconsidered decision of the Disciplinary Board becomes effective on
the date it is submitted to the Rector’s Office. |
CHAPTER V
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Announcement of Disciplinary Matters |
22. |
(1) |
Announcement of the disciplinary issues (opening of the case, student’s
summoning to the Disciplinary Committee as the ‘accused’ or a ‘witness’
etc...) to the student takes place by sending an invitation to the relevant
Faculty Dean’s Office or School Director or Department Chair’s Office. A
notice is posted on the announcement boards of the academic unit where the
relevant student is registered to. The notice in question informs the student
that s/he can collect the invitation from the Secretariat of the relevant
academic unit. However, detailed information on the subject of the invitation
is not specified in the written notice. The announcement is considered to
have been communicated to the student when the invitation has been posted on
the notice boards of the relevant academic unit at least 3 working days prior
to the meeting date and has been sent to the student’s email address with the
“emu.edu.tr” extension, as well as being placed in the personal student
portal. |
(2) |
The invitations extended to those summoned as
witnesses shall specify the purpose and subject matter for which they are being
called before the Disciplinary Board, and it shall be indicated that failure
to comply with the summons without a valid excuse or failure to timely
communicate any excuse shall constitute a disciplinary offense. |
||
(3) |
The invitations extended to those summoned as
defendants shall specify the nature of the alleged offense and inform them of
the designated day, time, and location where they can present their defense.
It shall be indicated that failure to comply with the summons without a valid
excuse or failure to timely communicate any excuse shall be deemed a waiver
of defense. Furthermore, it will be stated that a decision will be rendered
based on other evidence in the event of such waiver. |
||
(4) |
Finalized disciplinary penalties are announced by
the Rector’s Office through the medium of relevant academic unit. Within 15
working days after receiving a given decision of the Disciplinary Board, the
Rector’s Office forwards the decision in writing via the Deans’ Office to the
Department Chair or School Directorate to be submitted to the student(s), and
to the Registrar’s Office to be placed in the student file(s). The relevant unit
calls the student to collect the written disciplinary board decision via
posting on the announcement board of the relevant unit. The student is
notified that the decision can be collected from the Secretariat of relevant
academic unit. However, personal information of the student is not violated by
the summons. Additionally, this disciplinary committee decision is also
communicated to the student's email address with the “emu.edu.tr” extension
and portal. The student receives the document for which the summons was
issued in a sealed envelope through signature confirmation from the
secretary’s office of the relevant Institute, Faculty, or School where they
are enrolled. |
||
(5) |
The student may receive the disciplinary board
decision through notice board announcements by signing for it, or by learning
about the decision through the portal or email. In any case, the appeal
period begins on the fifth (5th) workings day of the date the decision is
sent via e-mail and student portal. However, if the starting date of the
appeal period determined in this manner coincides with the period between the
first day of final exams of the relevant semester and the start date of
classes for the next semester, the appeal period begins from the class
commencement date of the following semester. |
CHAPTER VI
APPLICATION AND APPEALS
Enforcement of Disciplinary Penalties |
23. |
(1) |
In
accordance with the Regulations for Student Disciplinary Code, the
relevant Institute, Dean’s or Director’s Office is responsible for
implementing the finalized disciplinary penalties. If deemed necessary, a
copy of the penalty announcement is sent to the University Security Affairs
Unit by the Rector’s Office. |
(2) |
The
disciplinary penalties cannot be implemented until the end of the
appealing period. Relevant Institute, Dean’s or Director’s Office determines
the dates to implement the Short-Term, Medium-Term and Long-Term Suspension
penalties. However, special care is put not to enforce ‘short’ and ‘medium’
term of suspension from the university during the exam periods specified in
the academic calendar of the relevant academic year. Calendar date is applied
in the imposition of penalties. In any case, penalties are imposed in
semesters student is registered to a course or courses. |
||
Appeals |
24. |
(1) |
No appeals can be filed for penalties of ‘Warning’ or a ‘Reprimand’. |
(2) |
The appeal period for short-, medium- and long-term suspensions is 5
working days as of the announcement of the penalty in accordance with Article
22. The student can appeal to the penalty by submitting a written objection
within 5 working days. The relevant penalty cannot be implemented during the
appeal period. |
||
(3) |
If deemed appropriate by the Rector, the imposition of ‘short-, medium-
or long-term suspensions’ from the University may be temporarily suspended
upon the appeal of the concerned student and the case is sent back to the
Disciplinary Board for a reconsideration. This requires the Rector to give
his/her reasons in writing for requesting this reconsideration of the case.
The Disciplinary Board must make a final decision on the issue within 10
working days excluding the duration of postponement period. If the final
decision is not changed, the implementation goes ahead as usual. In the event
that the Board has decided to change its decision, the procedure continues as
given in Article 21 of this Regulation. |
||
(4) |
Appeal period for ‘Dismissal from the University’ is 15 working days as
of the announcement of the decision. The appeals against ‘Dismissal from the
University’ are sent to the Senate by the Rector. The Senate re-examines the
case and gives the accused another chance to defend himself or herself. The
Senate may ask for extra information in writing from the Disciplinary Board
and/or the accused. The decision is rendered within 30 working days from the
date the application is submitted, starting from the first Senate meeting
following the submission date. The Senate may approve, cancel, or impose
another penalty as specified in this discipline regulation for the decision
of dismissal from the university. The decision of the Senate in this matter
is final. In the event that the Senate approves the decision concerning the
appeal, the penalty of dismissal from the university is enforced. |
CHAPTER VII
OTHER PROVISIONS
Investigation of Sex Crimes |
25. |
The investigator investigating a case to do with sex crimes receive the
support of the “Unit Against Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault” operating
within the University. |
|
Issuance of a Penalty of One
Degree Higher Severity |
26. |
The recurrence of an offense previously penalized during the same
academic year entails a penalty of one-degree higher severity. However, the
penalty of ‘dismissal from the University’ cannot be imposed as a higher
degree penalty. |
|
Community Involvement Projects |
27. |
(1) |
Students who received short-, medium- and long-term suspension penalties
are liable for participating in Community Involvement Projects. The students
fulfill this liability within the framework of Community Involvement Center,
Principles for Rehabilitation and Implementation of Community Involvement
Projects. |
(2) |
Following the expiration of the disciplinary penalty, the student carries
out community involvement projects within the dates to be specified by the
Community Involvement Center. However, upon the request of the student and if
deemed appropriate by the Community Involvement Center, the community
involvement projects may be carried out during the disciplinary penalty
period. |
||
Pardoning of Penalties |
28. |
(1) |
After having served the disciplinary penalty recorded in his/her student
file, if the student is observed to have been flawless in his/her conduct for
a minimum of one year or having time less than one year until his7her
graduation, the student can apply for a pardon on the condition that s/he
does not receive additional disciplinary penalties and fulfills duties in
community involvement projects to be determined by the Community Involvement
Center. |
21.02.2024 R.G. 37 EK III A.E. 181 |
(2) |
Penalties of ‘Warning’ and ‘Reprimand’ can be pardoned by the issuing
Chair or Disciplinary Board, and penalties of ‘Short’, ‘Medium’ and ‘Long’
term suspensions can be pardoned upon the recommendation of the relevant
Dean’s Office or Directorate and the approval of the Senate. |
|
|
(3) |
Disciplinary penalties received by students registered at Eastern
Mediterranean University in programs they have previously studied or
graduated from may be forgiven, provided that they meet the conditions
specified in this regulation, through the method determined in this
regulation. |
|
|
(4) |
In an event of a penalty being pardoned, the imposed penalty is not
recorded in the documents given to the student. However, loss suffered by the
student as a result of the penalty is not compensated. |
|
Administrative Precaution |
29. |
(1) |
While forwarding the case of a student to the Disciplinary Board and
before the completion of the disciplinary proceedings, with the approval of
the Rectors’ office, the Vice Rector under whose responsibility the Student
Disciplinary Board, a Dean or a Director of School may be authorized to
impose a precautionary suspension on a student: suspending the student form
the University or banning his/her entrance to lectures, laboratories,
workshops and examinations. |
(2) |
Students
who have been issued ‘short’, ‘medium’ or ‘long term’ suspension are not
banned from dormitories. However, in cases where there is a
possibility that the student who received a penalty or is currently
under disciplinary investigation may violate the security or peace of the
dormitory, Vice Rector under whose responsibility the Student Disciplinary
Board appear may ban the student from entering the dormitories. |
CHAPTER VIII
FINAL PROVISIONS
Repealing |
30. |
This regulation repeals the ‘Eastern Mediterranean University Regulations
for Student Disciplinary Code’ which came into force upon the Eastern
Mediterranean University Senate decision (ref. no S99/175-12). |
Executive Power |
31. |
This regulation is executed by the Eastern Mediterranean University,
Rector’s Office. |
Coming into Force |
32. |
This regulation comes into force as of the date its
publication in the Official Gazette. |